With its standard Active Driving Assistant, the BMW X2 is better at preventing collisions with pedestrians than the Honda CR-V, according to the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety:
|   
  | 
     X2  | 
     CR-V  | 
  
|   Overall Evaluation  | 
     GOOD  | 
     ACCEPTABLE  | 
  
|   
  | 
     Crossing Child - DAY  | 
  |
|   12 MPH  | 
     AVOIDED  | 
     -10 MPH  | 
  
|   25 MPH  | 
     AVOIDED  | 
     -18 MPH  | 
  
|   
  | 
     Crossing Adult - NIGHT  | 
  |
|   12 MPH Brights  | 
     AVOIDED  | 
     AVOIDED  | 
  
|   12 MPH Low beams  | 
     AVOIDED  | 
     No Slowing  | 
  
|   25 MPH Brights  | 
     AVOIDED  | 
     AVOIDED  | 
  
|   25 MPH Low beams  | 
     AVOIDED  | 
     -17 MPH  | 
  
|   
  | 
     Parallel Adult - NIGHT  | 
  |
|   25 MPH Brights  | 
     AVOIDED  | 
     AVOIDED  | 
  
|   25 MPH Low beams  | 
     AVOIDED  | 
     No Slowing  | 
  
|   37 MPH Brights  | 
     AVOIDED  | 
     -33 MPH  | 
  
|   37 MPH Low beams  | 
     AVOIDED  | 
     No Slowing  | 
  
|   Warning Issued-Low beams  | 
     1.4 sec  | 
     No Warning  | 
  
To provide maximum traction and stability on all roads, All-Wheel Drive is standard on the X2. But it costs extra on the CR-V.
The X2 offers an optional Surround View to allow the driver to see objects all around the vehicle on a screen. The CR-V only offers a rear monitor and front and rear parking sensors that beep or flash a light. That doesn’t help with obstacles to the sides.
To help make backing out of a parking space safer, the X2 has standard Cross Traffic Warning with braking function and automatically engage the brakes. Rear cross-path warning is not offered on the CR-VLX and the CR-V’s Cross Traffic Monitor does not include automatic braking.
Both the X2 and the CR-V have standard driver and passenger frontal airbags, front side-impact airbags, driver and front passenger knee airbags, side-impact head airbags, front seatbelt pretensioners, four-wheel antilock brakes, traction control, electronic stability systems to prevent skidding, crash mitigating brakes, daytime running lights, lane departure warning systems and rearview cameras.
Side impacts caused 23% of all road fatalities in 2018, down from 29% in 2003, when the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety introduced its side barrier test. In order to continue improving vehicle safety, the IIHS has started using a more severe side impact test: 37 MPH (up from 31 MPH), with a 4180-pound barrier (up from 3300 pounds). The results of this newly developed test demonstrates that the BMW X2 is safer than the CR-V:
|   
  | 
     X2  | 
     CR-V  | 
  
|   Overall Evaluation  | 
     GOOD  | 
     GOOD  | 
  
|   Structure  | 
     GOOD  | 
     GOOD  | 
  
|   
  | 
     Driver Injury Measures  | 
  |
|   Head/Neck  | 
     GOOD  | 
     GOOD  | 
  
|   Head Injury Criterion  | 
     125  | 
     138  | 
  
|   Torso  | 
     GOOD  | 
     ACCEPTABLE  | 
  
|   Torso Max Deflection  | 
     1.1 in  | 
     1.3 in  | 
  
|   Pelvis  | 
     GOOD  | 
     ACCEPTABLE  | 
  
|   Pelvis Force  | 
     736 lbs.  | 
     1093 lbs.  | 
  
|   Head Protection  | 
     GOOD  | 
     GOOD  | 
  
|   
  | 
     Passenger Injury Measures  | 
  |
|   Head/Neck  | 
     GOOD  | 
     GOOD  | 
  
|   Neck Compression  | 
     67 lbs.  | 
     89 lbs.  | 
  
|   Torso  | 
     GOOD  | 
     GOOD  | 
  
|   Torso Max Deflection  | 
     .94 in  | 
     1.06 in  | 
  
|   Torso Deflection Rate  | 
     6 MPH  | 
     7 MPH  | 
  
|   Head Protection  | 
     GOOD  | 
     GOOD  | 
  

